web design done right
The World Wide Web truly represents the birth
of a new mass medium. Along with the thrill and excitement of
taking part in this brave new world, we must face the inevitable
growing pains that come along with it. Where we stand today,
undertaking the development of a web site is no trivial task.
Incompatibilities between browsers, and the huge base of legacy
browsers still in use out there, make developing a site today a
daunting task. All off the great new features that everyone wants
to use come at a price. Do you lock out a user base in the
millions because their browsers won't work with the newer
technologies? Do you "dumb down" your site in plain vanilla so
that everyone can see it? Or do you make multiple versions of
your site, trying to accommodate everyone?
These are tough questions, and without a web professional to
help guide you through, the swimming is going to get very, very
rough.
Let me help you with your questions regarding the development of
your web site. Email me today for a free
consultation.

|
examples
The best example to start with is the
site you are looking at. It is my greatest achievement in web
development, and it illustrates many principles one has to reckon
with when designing for the world wide web. But before going any
further, I would like to thank Al Sparber and Gerry Jacobson of
Projectseven.com for
providing the inspiration for this web site, Massimo Foti of Massimocorner.com for his
generosity in sharing his Dreamweaver extensions and knowledge,
and Eddie Traversa of DHTML Nirvana for showing
me what is possible in web design. This site was coded in
Homesite, Dreamweaver, Topstyle, Flash and HTML Kit.
This site was first posted in December of 2001. After
wrestling with my previous site design for an inordinate amount
of time, trying to make it display properly in Netscape Navigator
4.x, and Internet Explorer 4.x and up, I had to make some hard
decisions. As this site became more and more complex, and as I
became more and more excited about the way it was turning out, it
soon became apparent that it was not going to work in Navigator
4.x without dumping significant features. I checked with
thecounter.com and saw that Netscape 4.x had shrunk down to 5%
market share. I figure that most of these users are corporate, we
all know how slow corporations are to upgrade their software.
That was all I needed to hear, goodbye Netscape 4.x. (And good
riddance!).
My next logical issue to deal with was Netscape 7.x, and
Opera 6.x. I built my pages and validated them with the W3C, and
lo and behold, they worked in Netscape, and kind of worked in
Opera. According to thecounter.com, their
market share as of 1/03 was 0% each. I mean, come on, I'm trying
to work with you...

|
what the...
Click
here to get a copy of my resume...
|
credentials

Recommended hosting service: CI Host
Audio Consulting
- Contact - Darkness in the Heart of
Your Soul - Music downloads - Help - Home - Inside/Out - Links - Listen
- Music Consulting
- Order - Radio - T-Shirts
- Tools - Web Consulting
- x.dreams
|
examples...
That leaves me with an 87% market share if I
support Internet Explorer 4.x and up. I must say that I wish
Netscape 6.2 and Opera could compete. Somebody should be
providing some competition for Microsoft. They shouldn't have the
only standards-compliant browser out there, but at this point in
time, it appears that they have.
On a more gut-level, bottom line note, I would like to say a
few words about design concepts. There is no right or wrong here,
these are just my feelings, arrived at after doing this for a few
years. I believe that it is better to have a compelling,
interesting site that may not be accessible to everyone out
there, than a boring, bland site that can be viewed in every
browser ever invented. I know that this model won't work for
everyone, but it is something to keep in mind. I have designed a
few sites now, and I can tell you that the "lowest common
denominator" sites, the ones created to load fast and be
backwards-compatible, don't generate as much traffic as the more
creative, less generic ones. Mind you, I am talking about sites
that I have created, and monitored their traffic on my server. I
think people want to be entertained, and that entertainment can
be visual, aural, or content driven.
This is a very exciting time, and the web is changing
quickly. We are all lucky to be able to help shape the birth of
this new mass medium.
-David Thomas Peacock
|
|